<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Designing a Bodybuilding Routine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/</link>
	<description>Advice for skinny guys who want to bulk up</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 05:50:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-13587</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 08:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-13587</guid>
		<description>I currently work out 5-6 times a week. 3 times arms/back and 3 times legs/abdominal.

Should I continue this way or is it better to do full body workouts like 3 times a week?

Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currently work out 5-6 times a week. 3 times arms/back and 3 times legs/abdominal.</p>
<p>Should I continue this way or is it better to do full body workouts like 3 times a week?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-12834</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 01:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-12834</guid>
		<description>This is a response to Toby: &quot;snatching&quot; just like squats, shoulder presses, dead lifts and other compound movements requires total body strength. This means that the muscles must know how to work together with the nervous system and the joints must have adapted for such movements. this type of strength only occurs through sport specific training using compound movements, many body builders size is unbalanced with their total body strength (mostly due to a weak core, it looks good, but it is small and therefore weak) Maximal strength training of specific muscles will improve the strength of the specific muscle but will not help total body coordination.individual muscle strength is a factor of size, but total body strength is also dependent on neuro-muscular adaptations between muscle groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a response to Toby: &#8220;snatching&#8221; just like squats, shoulder presses, dead lifts and other compound movements requires total body strength. This means that the muscles must know how to work together with the nervous system and the joints must have adapted for such movements. this type of strength only occurs through sport specific training using compound movements, many body builders size is unbalanced with their total body strength (mostly due to a weak core, it looks good, but it is small and therefore weak) Maximal strength training of specific muscles will improve the strength of the specific muscle but will not help total body coordination.individual muscle strength is a factor of size, but total body strength is also dependent on neuro-muscular adaptations between muscle groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-11908</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-11908</guid>
		<description>Just a quick question but if having maximal strength increases mass then why do you have people who weigh 56kg who can snatch 120kg ish  and there will be bodybuilders who weigh twice that and would find it hard to snatch a similar weight

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick question but if having maximal strength increases mass then why do you have people who weigh 56kg who can snatch 120kg ish  and there will be bodybuilders who weigh twice that and would find it hard to snatch a similar weight</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ross</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-9145</link>
		<dc:creator>ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 13:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-9145</guid>
		<description>After reading other article on this  site I  realized use of the  harris-benedict equation is already suggested, I apologize for my ignorance in the previous post in this section.
I have a question /comment about the  last section of this article &quot;advanced bodybuilding routine&quot;.    Thomas mentions the use of isolation exercises to shape the muscle.  Does anyone here think one can  shape the muscle or is it possible using isolation exercises helps with full development of the muscle group being trained via different angles/movements etc. , meaning the muscle is being hit squarely on the mark insuring all fibers are worked.
 for example, personally  once I started really concentrating on side raises I notice improvement in my shoulders that just couldn&#039;t be achieved with heavy pressing.   I agree hard work on the compound lifts are the best way to get big and strong however I think its ok to include 1 or 2 isolation movements earlier in the process especially if you have identified a weak muscle group.   My chest also gets chest much larger when i do flys and pressing together when compared to just pressing.   
isolation exercises I think have place with intermediate trainees
flys- lay on floor use strict form go slow 6-12 reps  2 -3 sets
side raises    
rear delt raises
I suggest picking 1 or 2 at most and sticking with the above programs outlined by Thomas. The routine he has outlined above is going to be hard to beat if you are looking for size gains.  Stay on the beginner routine as long as you keep making strength gains</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading other article on this  site I  realized use of the  harris-benedict equation is already suggested, I apologize for my ignorance in the previous post in this section.<br />
I have a question /comment about the  last section of this article &#8220;advanced bodybuilding routine&#8221;.    Thomas mentions the use of isolation exercises to shape the muscle.  Does anyone here think one can  shape the muscle or is it possible using isolation exercises helps with full development of the muscle group being trained via different angles/movements etc. , meaning the muscle is being hit squarely on the mark insuring all fibers are worked.<br />
 for example, personally  once I started really concentrating on side raises I notice improvement in my shoulders that just couldn&#8217;t be achieved with heavy pressing.   I agree hard work on the compound lifts are the best way to get big and strong however I think its ok to include 1 or 2 isolation movements earlier in the process especially if you have identified a weak muscle group.   My chest also gets chest much larger when i do flys and pressing together when compared to just pressing.<br />
isolation exercises I think have place with intermediate trainees<br />
flys- lay on floor use strict form go slow 6-12 reps  2 -3 sets<br />
side raises<br />
rear delt raises<br />
I suggest picking 1 or 2 at most and sticking with the above programs outlined by Thomas. The routine he has outlined above is going to be hard to beat if you are looking for size gains.  Stay on the beginner routine as long as you keep making strength gains</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ross</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-9066</link>
		<dc:creator>ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 21:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-9066</guid>
		<description>calorie equation
http://www.bmi-calculator.net/bmr-calculator/harris-benedict-equation/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>calorie equation<br />
<a href="http://www.bmi-calculator.net/bmr-calculator/harris-benedict-equation/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bmi-calculator.net/bmr-calculator/harris-benedict-equation/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ross</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-9065</link>
		<dc:creator>ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 21:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-9065</guid>
		<description>I  am new to this site is it assumed readers a re taking drugs. If this is  for natural hard gainers it seems wrong to reference famous body builders that juiced. can you  be more specific as to  why you don&#039;t accept high rep high volume  as a method  for hypertrophy, if i understand you, people watch bodybuilders cutting routines and assume that&#039;s how&quot;bodybuilders&quot; train to get big?? so do body builders hide when doing their lower reps sets or why don&#039;t we know about those routines?( honest question) it seems skinny folks might benefit especially due to fiber type ratios it also seems to be gaining in popularity most likely because of Rippetoe &amp; Kilgores practical programing.   I agree with you heavy reps with a good time under tension seem to work  better than high rep at least for me.   
Also I disagree with the notion one has to gain fat &quot;bulk up&quot; to gain muscle.  Most adults cannot gain more than 15 lbs of muscle in  a year with out drugs, that is 1.25 lbs a month only requiring 100 calories over the total daily expenditure.  While its far easier to just eat a ton of food and gain muscle, why not avoid the fat and take the time to eat properly. I guess my point is I find most bulk diets are excessive and people start see their weight increase but the reality is they are gaining fat real muscle gains take time, I have been able to gain muscle without getting fat and yes i was skinny it took me a while to figure it  out, the problem is  its a lot of work getting the calories just right. here is the tool i used to figure  out my the calories i need to gain muscle and lose fat what are your thoughts on bukling</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  am new to this site is it assumed readers a re taking drugs. If this is  for natural hard gainers it seems wrong to reference famous body builders that juiced. can you  be more specific as to  why you don&#8217;t accept high rep high volume  as a method  for hypertrophy, if i understand you, people watch bodybuilders cutting routines and assume that&#8217;s how&#8221;bodybuilders&#8221; train to get big?? so do body builders hide when doing their lower reps sets or why don&#8217;t we know about those routines?( honest question) it seems skinny folks might benefit especially due to fiber type ratios it also seems to be gaining in popularity most likely because of Rippetoe &amp; Kilgores practical programing.   I agree with you heavy reps with a good time under tension seem to work  better than high rep at least for me.<br />
Also I disagree with the notion one has to gain fat &#8220;bulk up&#8221; to gain muscle.  Most adults cannot gain more than 15 lbs of muscle in  a year with out drugs, that is 1.25 lbs a month only requiring 100 calories over the total daily expenditure.  While its far easier to just eat a ton of food and gain muscle, why not avoid the fat and take the time to eat properly. I guess my point is I find most bulk diets are excessive and people start see their weight increase but the reality is they are gaining fat real muscle gains take time, I have been able to gain muscle without getting fat and yes i was skinny it took me a while to figure it  out, the problem is  its a lot of work getting the calories just right. here is the tool i used to figure  out my the calories i need to gain muscle and lose fat what are your thoughts on bukling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-7733</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-7733</guid>
		<description>right so we are saying that the best way to Bulk up is to do excersize with your hole body insted of one part at a time ( just working arms ) is no good. Actually i have herd that you do need to do legs to improve arms so yeah basically your hole body like rolling them massive tiers. e.t. i have been training for a good three years i i dont have much gains im 19 5ft8 and have around 12 percent body fat how can i be tottaly ripped and Bulk up ? dose any one no i have done as much reacerch and this site is the most diffrent to all the otheres that why im intrested ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>right so we are saying that the best way to Bulk up is to do excersize with your hole body insted of one part at a time ( just working arms ) is no good. Actually i have herd that you do need to do legs to improve arms so yeah basically your hole body like rolling them massive tiers. e.t. i have been training for a good three years i i dont have much gains im 19 5ft8 and have around 12 percent body fat how can i be tottaly ripped and Bulk up ? dose any one no i have done as much reacerch and this site is the most diffrent to all the otheres that why im intrested ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Din</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-4123</link>
		<dc:creator>Din</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 05:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-4123</guid>
		<description>You are my hero, I&#039;ll start my bulking rutine this week!!

Thank you very much for all of your hard work!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are my hero, I&#8217;ll start my bulking rutine this week!!</p>
<p>Thank you very much for all of your hard work!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-3503</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-3503</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think you&#039;ll be wasting your time.  Injury prevention is very important; it&#039;s the difference between guys who make progress and those who never seem to get anywhere.  Lots of (young) guys do very well adding mass with a 5x5 program, but higher reps are great if you have flexibility issues.

There are many weight lifting programs on the &#039;net, so research them all and come to your own conclusions.  Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll be wasting your time.  Injury prevention is very important; it&#8217;s the difference between guys who make progress and those who never seem to get anywhere.  Lots of (young) guys do very well adding mass with a 5&#215;5 program, but higher reps are great if you have flexibility issues.</p>
<p>There are many weight lifting programs on the &#8216;net, so research them all and come to your own conclusions.  Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-3502</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-3502</guid>
		<description>Hi Thomas,

This information is great, I&#039;m going to try bulking up with these recommendations in mind.  Quick question though: If you&#039;re a bit injury prone, would you stick to a higher rep range - say 8-12, or is that just wasting your time?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Thomas,</p>
<p>This information is great, I&#8217;m going to try bulking up with these recommendations in mind.  Quick question though: If you&#8217;re a bit injury prone, would you stick to a higher rep range &#8211; say 8-12, or is that just wasting your time?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-3431</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-3431</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I meant that the size of a &lt;strong&gt;particular muscle&lt;/strong&gt; will develop more slowly.

The classic example of this phenomenon is the comparison between barbell rows and machine rows.  With the machine, most of the stress of the movement is focused on the &lt;i&gt;lats&lt;/i&gt;.  With the barbell row, the lats don&#039;t get fully worked until the lower back is strong enough to take the strain of supporting not only the fully-loaded barbell, but the weight of the upper torso.

Anything that reduces the need for core strength, supporting muscles, etc. helps you build size, especially when you&#039;re doing isolation exercises.  Of course, most sensible people don&#039;t want to neglect their whole-body strength just to get a bit more size in a given muscle, but if you&#039;re a pure bodybuilder you have to find ways to increase intensity.

Please understand that I&#039;m not recommending this sort of workout program to anyone in particular.  The article explains why certain bodybuilders do things the way they do.  &lt;i&gt;Their&lt;/i&gt; needs are not necessarily &lt;i&gt;your&lt;/i&gt; needs.

I&#039;ll never tell anyone to focus on the &lt;em&gt;size of a muscle&lt;/em&gt; instead of the &lt;em&gt;strength of a movement&lt;/em&gt;.  But for bodybuilders who &lt;em&gt;do&lt;/em&gt; focus almost exclusively on the size of an isolated muscle, a free-weight barbell is less useful than a well-designed isolation machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I meant that the size of a <strong>particular muscle</strong> will develop more slowly.</p>
<p>The classic example of this phenomenon is the comparison between barbell rows and machine rows.  With the machine, most of the stress of the movement is focused on the <i>lats</i>.  With the barbell row, the lats don&#8217;t get fully worked until the lower back is strong enough to take the strain of supporting not only the fully-loaded barbell, but the weight of the upper torso.</p>
<p>Anything that reduces the need for core strength, supporting muscles, etc. helps you build size, especially when you&#8217;re doing isolation exercises.  Of course, most sensible people don&#8217;t want to neglect their whole-body strength just to get a bit more size in a given muscle, but if you&#8217;re a pure bodybuilder you have to find ways to increase intensity.</p>
<p>Please understand that I&#8217;m not recommending this sort of workout program to anyone in particular.  The article explains why certain bodybuilders do things the way they do.  <i>Their</i> needs are not necessarily <i>your</i> needs.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll never tell anyone to focus on the <em>size of a muscle</em> instead of the <em>strength of a movement</em>.  But for bodybuilders who <em>do</em> focus almost exclusively on the size of an isolated muscle, a free-weight barbell is less useful than a well-designed isolation machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-3430</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-3430</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re not gaining weight, cut out the cardio for a while.  I don&#039;t want to give recommendations because I think everyone needs to personalize their own workout programs.  I certainly don&#039;t intend this article to be a cookie-cutter routine that you should use without modification; it&#039;s just an overview of the thought process behind size-oriented bodybuilding routines.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://health.gov&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Health.gov&lt;/a&gt; says you need 30 minutes of moderately-intense cardio just about every day.  But cutting out the cardio for a while isn&#039;t the end of the world, if you do it to gain muscle mass.  Some bodybuilders use weight lifting as a form of cardio.  It&#039;s why many bodybuilders recommend shorter rest periods between sets, at least when they&#039;re cutting fat.

So, keep accurate records, make sure you&#039;re getting the results you want, and remember that you should focus on one main goal at a time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re not gaining weight, cut out the cardio for a while.  I don&#8217;t want to give recommendations because I think everyone needs to personalize their own workout programs.  I certainly don&#8217;t intend this article to be a cookie-cutter routine that you should use without modification; it&#8217;s just an overview of the thought process behind size-oriented bodybuilding routines.</p>
<p><a href="http://health.gov" rel="nofollow">Health.gov</a> says you need 30 minutes of moderately-intense cardio just about every day.  But cutting out the cardio for a while isn&#8217;t the end of the world, if you do it to gain muscle mass.  Some bodybuilders use weight lifting as a form of cardio.  It&#8217;s why many bodybuilders recommend shorter rest periods between sets, at least when they&#8217;re cutting fat.</p>
<p>So, keep accurate records, make sure you&#8217;re getting the results you want, and remember that you should focus on one main goal at a time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dilan</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-3408</link>
		<dc:creator>Dilan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-3408</guid>
		<description>Hello Thomas,
I have found your article extremely helpful and informative. I do, however, have one question. Should cardio - such as running or using an elliptical - be cut out completely? If not, how often should a cardiovascular workout be included?

Thank you,
-Dilan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Thomas,<br />
I have found your article extremely helpful and informative. I do, however, have one question. Should cardio &#8211; such as running or using an elliptical &#8211; be cut out completely? If not, how often should a cardiovascular workout be included?</p>
<p>Thank you,<br />
-Dilan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-3407</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 10:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-3407</guid>
		<description>Why does using &quot;barbells instead of bodybuilding machines&quot; mean &quot;your size will develop more slowly&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does using &#8220;barbells instead of bodybuilding machines&#8221; mean &#8220;your size will develop more slowly&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-2724</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-2724</guid>
		<description>Rav,

It&#039;s a pain in the A**, but here&#039;s a possible solution.

Bodybuilders, lift in two stages.  A bulking stage, and a cutting stage.  The guys you see on the cover of muscle mags are in the cutting stage.  Most pro body builders cant keep that physique year round.  They face the same problem you do, but a little more extreme.  This article points to a push pull program, which is phenomenal.  most lifter will tell you it&#039;s the best way to gain size.  Especially upper body size.  For your body now, stick with the push pull workout.    In my opinion, it is easier to bulk up before cutting down.  I would try bulking up your arms and legs before trying to slim down your chest and gut.  It will be more weight gain in the begining, but the results of larger muscles will be more present.  For the gaining of muscle, a different set up would be to use a 12-10-8-6-12-12 rep set.      You also will want to be eating more, more often.  Try eating 6 meals a day.  Still do your breakfast lunch dinner, and throw in a few smaller meals as well.  It&#039;s good to take protein supplements .5 to 1 gram per pound of body weight.  Magazine&#039;s will tell you more, but anything your body cant use it wastes.  After your size gains I would start to cut up.  I believe the difference is if you cut first, then try to gain you&#039;ll find yourself in the same boat as before.  You&#039;ll have the definition, but lack the mass.  This is just a suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rav,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a pain in the A**, but here&#8217;s a possible solution.</p>
<p>Bodybuilders, lift in two stages.  A bulking stage, and a cutting stage.  The guys you see on the cover of muscle mags are in the cutting stage.  Most pro body builders cant keep that physique year round.  They face the same problem you do, but a little more extreme.  This article points to a push pull program, which is phenomenal.  most lifter will tell you it&#8217;s the best way to gain size.  Especially upper body size.  For your body now, stick with the push pull workout.    In my opinion, it is easier to bulk up before cutting down.  I would try bulking up your arms and legs before trying to slim down your chest and gut.  It will be more weight gain in the begining, but the results of larger muscles will be more present.  For the gaining of muscle, a different set up would be to use a 12-10-8-6-12-12 rep set.      You also will want to be eating more, more often.  Try eating 6 meals a day.  Still do your breakfast lunch dinner, and throw in a few smaller meals as well.  It&#8217;s good to take protein supplements .5 to 1 gram per pound of body weight.  Magazine&#8217;s will tell you more, but anything your body cant use it wastes.  After your size gains I would start to cut up.  I believe the difference is if you cut first, then try to gain you&#8217;ll find yourself in the same boat as before.  You&#8217;ll have the definition, but lack the mass.  This is just a suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rav</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-2454</link>
		<dc:creator>Rav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-2454</guid>
		<description>Hi Thomas,
Firstly, great article! But I wondered if you might be able to help me with a problem I&#039;m having. I&#039;m 6&#039;2 and about 180lbs. I have tried bulking up using a similar technique to what you describe in your beginners routine. The problem is, I find that I don&#039;t have proper weight distribution for my body. Any weight I put on goes straight to my mid-section (chest and gut). I have now completely cut out any cardio exercises to avoid losing the weight, but still I find I&#039;m unable to increase size and strength in my arms and legs. As a result, my body is so out of proportion, its frustrating!

My aim is to bulk up my legs and arms but tone down my gut and chest. I understand I can&#039;t achieve both at once, but could you recommend any way in which I can get the results in the shortest time possible, and any changes I should try to make to enhance my results, both on the exercises and also on diet?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Thomas,<br />
Firstly, great article! But I wondered if you might be able to help me with a problem I&#8217;m having. I&#8217;m 6&#8217;2 and about 180lbs. I have tried bulking up using a similar technique to what you describe in your beginners routine. The problem is, I find that I don&#8217;t have proper weight distribution for my body. Any weight I put on goes straight to my mid-section (chest and gut). I have now completely cut out any cardio exercises to avoid losing the weight, but still I find I&#8217;m unable to increase size and strength in my arms and legs. As a result, my body is so out of proportion, its frustrating!</p>
<p>My aim is to bulk up my legs and arms but tone down my gut and chest. I understand I can&#8217;t achieve both at once, but could you recommend any way in which I can get the results in the shortest time possible, and any changes I should try to make to enhance my results, both on the exercises and also on diet?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zack</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-2441</link>
		<dc:creator>zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-2441</guid>
		<description>Right. I see what you mean. In the past I have tried Chad Waterbury&#039;s recommendation of aiming for total reps while using a specified rep range and weight level. For example, get 25 reps out of a 4-6 rep max weight level, with the number of sets undefined. Sometimes I ended up doing singles for the last 2 sets because that&#039;s all the strength I have left. It might go like this 6-5-5-4-3-1-1. It&#039;s unclear from what he writes if this is the way he thinks it should go or not, but I thought so. Results were OK, not spectacular, but not nothing. I definitely got stronger on that routine, for a while, a little bigger too. 

By making the rep range wide at 4-8, though, I imagine that one would be trying to encourage more sets than, say, a 6-8 or 4-6 range would allow. Is that part of the point? Is it a quasi-volume approach?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right. I see what you mean. In the past I have tried Chad Waterbury&#8217;s recommendation of aiming for total reps while using a specified rep range and weight level. For example, get 25 reps out of a 4-6 rep max weight level, with the number of sets undefined. Sometimes I ended up doing singles for the last 2 sets because that&#8217;s all the strength I have left. It might go like this 6-5-5-4-3-1-1. It&#8217;s unclear from what he writes if this is the way he thinks it should go or not, but I thought so. Results were OK, not spectacular, but not nothing. I definitely got stronger on that routine, for a while, a little bigger too. </p>
<p>By making the rep range wide at 4-8, though, I imagine that one would be trying to encourage more sets than, say, a 6-8 or 4-6 range would allow. Is that part of the point? Is it a quasi-volume approach?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-2438</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-2438</guid>
		<description>Hi Zack:

I don&#039;t believe there should be a hard-and-fast rule about how many sets to perform.

Maybe the article needs a bit of editing, but it &lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt; say to do as many sets as possible until you can no longer maintain the &lt;b&gt;rep range&lt;/b&gt; that you are shooting for.  That is, if you want to stay in the 8 to 10 rep range, keep doing sets until you can no longer get at least 8 reps.  This assumes that you have adequate rest periods between sets.  Obviously, if you only rest 45 seconds between sets you&#039;ll be unable to do as many sets as you could if you had rested 3 minutes.

I don&#039;t want to be in the business of prescribing a &lt;i&gt;one size fits all&lt;/i&gt; workout for anyone who stumbles across this site.

I&#039;m not willing to tell people to &quot;&lt;i&gt;just do 5 sets and then move on to the next exercise&lt;/i&gt;.&quot;  I believe a person should tweak his workout program so it complements his own abilities.  Things like long- and short-term recovery ability, and desired rep range play a large part in how many sets are ideal.  A guy who is new to working out won&#039;t have anywhere near the recovery ability of an expert.  His sets will, by necessity, be less.  There&#039;s no point in me telling this new guy that he &lt;b&gt;has to&lt;/b&gt; use 5 work sets or he&#039;s just shortchanging himself.

For bodybuilding -- unlike other strength training sports -- you want to exhaust the muscles so no muscle fiber is left untouched.  This can only be done by performing as many sets as possible at a given rep range and weight.  Some days, it might take 5 sets, other days only 3.

Note that &quot;warm-up&quot; sets are important, especially when the reps go below 8 or so.  These aren&#039;t counted as &quot;real&quot; sets because the weight is lighter than that used in the &quot;work&quot; sets.  I may write an article about warm-up sets sometime, but there&#039;s already a lot of good stuff about this subject on the &#039;web (most of it cribbed from Mark Ripptoe&#039;s book).

Hope that helps; thanx for the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Zack:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe there should be a hard-and-fast rule about how many sets to perform.</p>
<p>Maybe the article needs a bit of editing, but it <i>should</i> say to do as many sets as possible until you can no longer maintain the <b>rep range</b> that you are shooting for.  That is, if you want to stay in the 8 to 10 rep range, keep doing sets until you can no longer get at least 8 reps.  This assumes that you have adequate rest periods between sets.  Obviously, if you only rest 45 seconds between sets you&#8217;ll be unable to do as many sets as you could if you had rested 3 minutes.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to be in the business of prescribing a <i>one size fits all</i> workout for anyone who stumbles across this site.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not willing to tell people to &#8220;<i>just do 5 sets and then move on to the next exercise</i>.&#8221;  I believe a person should tweak his workout program so it complements his own abilities.  Things like long- and short-term recovery ability, and desired rep range play a large part in how many sets are ideal.  A guy who is new to working out won&#8217;t have anywhere near the recovery ability of an expert.  His sets will, by necessity, be less.  There&#8217;s no point in me telling this new guy that he <b>has to</b> use 5 work sets or he&#8217;s just shortchanging himself.</p>
<p>For bodybuilding &#8212; unlike other strength training sports &#8212; you want to exhaust the muscles so no muscle fiber is left untouched.  This can only be done by performing as many sets as possible at a given rep range and weight.  Some days, it might take 5 sets, other days only 3.</p>
<p>Note that &#8220;warm-up&#8221; sets are important, especially when the reps go below 8 or so.  These aren&#8217;t counted as &#8220;real&#8221; sets because the weight is lighter than that used in the &#8220;work&#8221; sets.  I may write an article about warm-up sets sometime, but there&#8217;s already a lot of good stuff about this subject on the &#8216;web (most of it cribbed from Mark Ripptoe&#8217;s book).</p>
<p>Hope that helps; thanx for the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zack</title>
		<link>http://skinnybulkup.com/designing-a-bodybuilding-routine/#comment-2437</link>
		<dc:creator>zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skinnybulkup.com/?p=823#comment-2437</guid>
		<description>Any recommendation for sets? I read this a couple of times and couldn&#039;t find any. Maybe I need my eyes checked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any recommendation for sets? I read this a couple of times and couldn&#8217;t find any. Maybe I need my eyes checked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

